Key debates at the 17th United Nations Forum on Minority Issues

This year's United Nations Forum on Minority Issues in Geneva attracted a record number of participants, reflecting the global diversity of minorities and the challenges they face. In a brief interview, Nicolas Levrat, United Nations Special Rapporteur on minority issues, shares his reflections on the Forum and looks ahead to future priorities.
The traditional 17th United Nations Forum on Minority Issues was held in Geneva on 28 and 29 November. The main organiser of the Forum is the United Nations Special Rapporteur on minority issues, Prof. Nicolas Levrat, a Swiss expert and former Vice-President of the Council of Europe’s Advisory Committee on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.
This year’s record number of almost 700 participants devoted most of the session to the issue of minorities in Africa, the Middle East and Asia, but some interventions also addressed the situation in Europe. Minority organisations as well as countries participate in the forum through their representatives on the UN Human Rights Council, which is based in Geneva.
This year there were not many interventions by diplomats from European countries. It is worth noting that Hungary was represented by Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó himself. He spoke about the Hungarians in Transcarpathia, i.e. the territory belonging to Ukraine, although he did not mention the country specifically. He said that this minority is not protected and that there are attempts to ban the use of the language in public, although it is taught in schools. „The international community has to intervene, this is not a bilateral issue,“ the minister stressed.
The Ukrainian representative, of course, focused on the issue of Russia, talking about the children abducted by Russians in Ukraine and now being assimilated. He said that international organisations should deal with this issue.
The representative of Austria, who took part in the debate on the media, took pride in the fact that minorities had more space on state television.
The ambassador of Slovenia explained the functioning of Italian and Hungarian minority schools.
Representatives of European minority organisations also took part in the discussion. The FUEN drew attention to the unacceptably negative attitude of the European Union towards the citizens’ initiative Minority SafePack, stressing that in the countries of the European Union about 50 million people, i.e. one tenth of the population, belong to minorities.
The organisation Minority Rights Group, which deals with the integration of Roma into society in some European countries, especially in the Balkans, focused mainly on the removal of obstacles that prevent minorities from fully expressing themselves culturally.
This time, ELEN focused on France, condemning the rejection of an application for a private radio station in Breton and the ban on the use of the Corsican language in the Corsican provincial assembly.
The Catalan organisation Òmnium Cultural has warned of the decline in the use of Catalan; a few years ago, 55 per cent of the population of Catalonia used the language regularly, now only 34 per cent do so; Spanish is also more widely used online, although Catalan is also available.
The Union of Turks of Western Thrace (ABTTF) focused on the issue of education. It accuses Greece of closing Turkish primary schools on the pretext of insufficient enrolment and of not granting permission to open bilingual kindergartens, although the minority has the means to maintain them.
The session was closed by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on minority issues, Nicolas Levrat, who expressed his satisfaction with the participation and the content of the discussion. He emphasised the democratic nature of the Forum, where representatives of minorities had the same space, i.e. two minutes, as representatives of countries. The purpose of a forum where „people we love meet people we don’t like“ is „to listen and also to act“. He commented on the statement of the Bangladeshi diplomat who assured the debate that his country was open to all journalists, and wished that it would also be open to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minorities. One of the rapporteur’s main limitations is that he can only visit those countries that explicitly invite him.
At the end of the session, Prof Levrat answered a few questions.
Nicolas Levrat
Prof. Nicolas Levrat is the fourth Special Rapporteur on minority issues. He was appointed by the Human Rights Council on 13 October 2023 and took up his functions as Special Rapporteur on 1 November 2023. He has devoted his academic research and teaching to the rights of peoples and minorities, federalism and the relationship between legal systems.
Bojan Brezigar: This year’s Forum was much quieter than last year’s...
Nicolas Levrat: Yes. You know, I live in Geneva, and last year I visited a number of permanent missions of UN member states and explained to them the importance of a more constructive approach to the Forum. Of course, there were still some tensions in the debate, but the interruption of speakers by countries was much less than last year. The atmosphere was better. Of course, I don’t know if it will be more effective, I hope so. I think you have noticed that some of the countries that intervened frequently in the debate in previous years have tried to keep interruptions to a minimum, preferring to ask for a reply after the debate. I think this is a constructive approach.
I have to do my best so that the people who come to see me and tell me about their problems are not disappointed.
Nicolas Levrat
Brezigar: No doubt, but also more positive.
Levrat: Of course, we will have to wait and see what happens in the coming months, but the discussion was more fluid and the atmosphere much calmer. As you know, I will be presenting a report to the Human Rights Council in March, and then I will see what the position of individual countries will be.
Brezigar: What do you make of the fact that the number of participants this year was a record?
Levrat: I don’t know exactly, but I think that the general human rights situation is worrying and that’s why minorities have mobilised a bit more. But I can’t say that for sure. I will send out some questionnaires to the participants to find out why they signed up. In any case, I think that such a massive response is very positive.
Brezigar: What are your plans for the future?
I will now be very busy preparing a report for the Human Rights Council in the spring, and I intend to focus it on the right to identity. I have a number of other reports to prepare, including one for the General Assembly.
So you have a lot of work to do...
Yes, but a fascinating one. I have to do my best so that the people who come to see me and tell me about their problems are not disappointed. You know, I have no real powers. I can ask questions, I can make recommendations, but I can’t make a final decision. Those are the rules.
Note: This article gives the views of the author and does not represent the position of the European Association of Daily Newspapers in Minority and Regional Languages (MIDAS) or Eurac Research.

Citation
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license except for third-party materials or where otherwise noted.
This blog is supported by the European Association of Daily Newspapers in Minority and Regional Languages (MIDAS). MIDAS was founded in 2001 to provide assistance to minority language newspapers and nowadays has members all over Europe. MIDAS serves as a platform for exchange, uniting minority language newspapers to present a collective voice to the European institutions.