
Borders as Bridges or Barriers: How Media Narratives Shape Perception
In borderlands populated by minorities, such as South Tyrol in Northern Italy or the Zaolzie region in Czechia, borders are more than simply lines on a map. They are emotional and cultural lifelines which connect families, businesses, and communities. Borders have a deep emotional and socio-economic significance in minority communities. Yet, the way borders are narrated in the media can also greatly influence how they are perceived. For example, are borders described as bridges which promote unity, or barriers that isolate and divide communities?
Minority media plays a key role in these debates and contributes to shaping minorities’ perceptions of borders and Europe through how they frame and write about re-bordering events. The B-Shapes project found that minority media often frame borders as a complex dilemma. On the one hand, borders are portrayed as special spaces with shared cultural and historical significance. On the other hand, they are presented as fault lines, where political and economic divides deepen, particularly during crises like the so-called migration crisis in 2015-16 and the COVID-19 pandemic. During these times, the notion of re-bordering—tightening restrictions and hardening boundaries—emerged strongly in media narratives.
The Disconnect Between the Local and the European Dimension
Re-bordering narratives risk reinforcing a sense of disconnection between local communities and broader European frameworks, and identity. For instance, when coverage emphasizes state governments' role in border policies rather than the EU's contributions, it reinforces a perception of Europe as a distant institution. This presentation of Europe overlooks the EU's efforts to facilitate cross-border cooperation and support minority communities.
The symbolic framing of borders also affects public feelings about them. For instance, depicting borders as barriers during re-bordering events can heighten feelings of insecurity and isolation, fueling nationalist rhetoric. Conversely, portraying them as bridges highlights shared European values such as mobility, solidarity, and cultural integration. The challenge for minority media lies in balancing these narratives to accurately reflect the dual nature of borders while encouraging a shared sense of purpose within the EU.
The Untapped Power of Minority Media in European Integration
Minority media occupy an important space in the European media landscape, offering perspectives that are otherwise overlooked. They serve as vital platforms for often marginalized minority voices and local perspectives and have the potential to act as connectors between local communities and European institutions, contributing to shaping a more inclusive narrative about integration and cohesion. However, this potential remains underutilized.
One of the most significant findings of the B-Shapes project is the lack of integration between local and European concerns in minority media coverage. While local issues dominate reporting, the broader context of European unity and cooperation is often sidelined. This creates a disconnect, where minority communities see the EU primarily as a policymaker or funding source rather than as a shared cultural and political space.
To bridge this gap, minority media could amplify stories that connect local experiences with European initiatives. For example, showcasing how EU policies support cultural preservation, cross-border mobility, or economic development, as these could create greater awareness of the EU's role in everyday life. Moreover, minority media have the potential to challenge narratives that reduce Europe to a set of bureaucratic structures. By focusing on human stories—such as individuals navigating cross-border lives, families reunited through EU mobility initiatives, or communities collaborating on shared challenges—they can make the European project more relatable and tangible. Such storytelling has the power to transform abstract policies into personal, impactful narratives.
Conclusion
Minority media have the potential to transform narratives on borders and European integration, fostering a more inclusive and democratic Europe. By amplifying marginalized voices and bridging local and European concerns, these outlets can challenge re-bordering narratives and build a more united continent. Supporting minority media is not just a policy imperative; it is a step toward realizing the EU's foundational values of diversity and inclusion.
In light of rising nationalist politics across Europe, the relevance of minority media is more critical than ever. As border regions grapple with geopolitical tensions, media must serve as a platform for marginalized voices and promote dialogue across divides. The EU’s recent discussions on revising border policies present a timely opportunity to reframe the role of media in bridging local and European narratives.
About B-Shapes
The Horizon Europe B-Shapes research project looks at the role of borders in shaping perceptions of societies, culture, heritage, and belonging. In the first phase of the project, the team has studied how minority media reports on borders and European integration. This has given us valuable insights into the role of local, national, and European narratives, in minority newspapers across Europe.
The project team studied six minority newspapers in four European borderlands: Der Nordschleswiger and Flensborg Avis in the Danish-German borderland, Dolomiten in the Italian-Austrian borderland, Głos in the Czech-Polish borderland as well as Új Szó and Felvidék.ma in the Slovak-Hungarian borderland. This blog post is based on a B-Shapes policy brief that summarizes our main findings and offers recommendations to media organizations and networks.
Acknowledgement: This article builds on research carried out by the Borders Shaping Perceptions of European Societies (B-SHAPES) research and innovation action funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe Programme, Grant Agreement No. 101095186 (B-SHAPES). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. Furthermore, this article does not necessarily represent the position of the European Association of Daily Newspapers in Minority and Regional Languages (MIDAS) or Eurac Research.



Citation
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license except for third-party materials or where otherwise noted.
This blog is supported by the European Association of Daily Newspapers in Minority and Regional Languages (MIDAS). MIDAS was founded in 2001 to provide assistance to minority language newspapers and nowadays has members all over Europe. MIDAS serves as a platform for exchange, uniting minority language newspapers to present a collective voice to the European institutions.